Answer quickly
A clear yes or no in weeks, not a quarter of polite silence. A fast no is worth more to a founder than a slow maybe.
10xC is a venture firm in formation. We are building it because the gap we kept running into was never talent — it was the institutional cheque before the metrics exist.
The C is for capital, and for compounding. A ten-times outcome in venture is not a slogan about ambition; it is the arithmetic that makes an early portfolio work at all. Most cheques return nothing, so the ones that return have to return a great deal.
We say it plainly because it sets an expectation both ways. We are looking for companies that could plausibly be worth a hundred times what we paid, and we should be honest with founders whose businesses — often good businesses — do not fit that shape.
The bench that can build world-class software here is already built. What is missing is the first person willing to fund it as a product company instead of renting it by the hour.
The reason 10xC exists
These are commitments we would like to be held to, especially by founders we decline.
A clear yes or no in weeks, not a quarter of polite silence. A fast no is worth more to a founder than a slow maybe.
If we pass, we say why, in writing, and what would change our mind. Founders can then argue with it.
We are early money, not a controlling shareholder. Founders should still own the company after the round.
Incorporation, cap table, first contracts and hiring letters. This is where early companies actually get damaged.
When another investor asks about a portfolio company, they get the same view we hold internally.
If a company is outside what we understand, the useful answer is a referral, not a small cheque and vague help.
Early-stage investors are frequently vague about their own behaviour. This is our attempt to be specific, so a founder can decide whether to spend an hour with us.
Before the round, before the deck. If you are building something and it is too early to raise, that is a good time to talk.